지금 금연하세요의견을 표명하세요
공유하기
지금 금연하세요

담배 기업 없는 캘리포니아는 가능성을 넘어 이미 실현되고 있습니다.

캘리포니아주 두개 도시에서는 담배 제품 판매가 중단되었습니다12

우리의 성과를 확인해보세요
Photo with no alt text
Photo with no alt text
Photo with no alt text
“

식당 내 흡연을 금지한 후, 우리 음식 맛이 더 좋아졌어요.

TRAN — 웨스트민스터, CA

오랜 역사의 레스토랑 주인은 1995년 금연법이 어떻게 담배 냄새를 몰아내고 환상적인 음식 냄새를 들여왔는지 회상합니다.

더 알아보기
“

저 혼자서만 담배를 피운다는 게 정말 창피해졌어요.

FRANKIE — 로스앤젤레스, CA

주변과 어울리기 위해 담배를 피우던 Frankie 는 중독 때문에 오히려 외톨이처럼 느껴지자 담배를 끊었습니다.

더 알아보기
“

담배 산업이 우리를 겨냥할수록 우리는 더 힘차게 반격할꺼에요.

LAYLA, GALIA, LIZZIE — 샌디에이고, CA

세명의 고등학생이 니코틴의 피해에 대한 분노로 담배 반대 운동을 전개합니다.

더 알아보기
“

우리는 베이핑과 정면으로 맞섰습니다. 그 방법 밖에 없었으니까요.

COACH SANCHEZ — 레딩, CA

선수들이 베이핑을 한다는 사실을 알게 된 Sanchez 코치는, 선수들의 가족들을 동원하여 경기장 안팎의 기준을 높이기 위해 힘썼습니다.

더 알아보기
우리의 캠페인

담배 기업의 환상의 나라

담배와 니코틴 기업은 베이핑이 “더 안전하다”라고 주장합니다.34 그러나 베이핑에는 비소, 납, 포름알데히드와 같은 발암 물질이 포함될 수 있습니다.56789101112131415161718192021 이제 진실을 깨달아야 할 때입니다.

니코틴 악몽의 실체를 밝혀내세요.
우리의 캠페인

Exhale (날숨)

두 도시에서 담배 판매가 중단되고 흡연과 폐암 발생률이 감소하면서, 담배 기업 없는 캘리포니아는 이미 실현되고 있습니다.12222324

자세히 보기
우리의 캠페인

니코틴은 뇌 독성물질입니다.

니코틴은 특히 젊은이들의 두뇌 발달에 위험한 중독성이 매우 강한 독이자 신경독입니다.2526272829

어린이 중독
우리의 캠페인

작고 큰 거짓말

담배꽁초는 미세 독성 섬유 물질인 미세플라스틱으로 만들어지며, 먹이 사슬을 오염시키고 당신의 몸속으로 스며들 수 있습니다.30313233

자세히 알아보기
Photo with no alt text

맛이 첨가된 담배 끝. 생명 구하기 시작.

새로운 법안은 베이프와 멘톨 담배를 포함한 대부분의 맛이 첨가된 담배 제품의 판매를 중단하고, 모든 캘리포니아 주민, 특히 우리 아이들을 치명적인 중독으로부터 보호합니다.343536

법 이해하기
“

그가 치료받고 얼마 지나지 않아, 그의 아내는 폐암에 걸렸습니다. 그녀는 평생 한 번도 담배를 피우지 않았지만 진단 후 얼마 지나지 않아 세상을 떠났습니다.

로렌스 옌 박사 — 이비인후과

담배 기업의 악영향

담배 기업은 지금도 죽음과 질병으로부터 이익을 얻기 위해 능수능란한 마케팅 전략과 정치적 영향력 확대에 수십억 달러를 투자합니다.3738
자세히 알아보기
심지어 담배를 흡연하지 않는 사람들에게도 치명적인 결과를 가져옵니다.39
자세히 알아보기
담배 기업은 어린이를 “대체 고객”이라고 부릅니다. 그들은 어린이에게 평생 중독과 질병을 선고합니다.40
자세히 알아보기
이 인종차별적이고 불공정한 기업은 전략적으로 치명적인 제품과 교묘한 메시지로 특정 지역사회를 겨냥해 왔습니다.41
자세히 알아보기
누구도 독성 담배 폐기물과 플라스틱 오염으로 인한 환경 피해와 건강 위험으로부터 안전하지 않습니다.30323342434445
자세히 알아보기

뉴스 (영어로 제공)

Banning Menthol Cigarettes: California-Based Advocacy Group Joins Suit Against Federal Govt.
Photo with no alt text
Urged on by LGBTQ+ Activists, California Cities Weigh Stricter Smoking Rules
Photo with no alt text
Yurok Join War on Tobacco with unprecedented policy
Photo with no alt text
Supreme Court leaves California’s ban on flavored cigarettes in place
Photo with no alt text
California’s Anti-Smoking Push Spurs Big Savings on Health Costs
Photo with no alt text
Voters approve California law banning flavored tobacco
Photo with no alt text
Photo with no alt text

소중한 사람들과 공간을 보호하세요.

담배 산업의 피해로부터 캘리포니아 주민들을 지키기 위해 목소리를 보태는 것은 잠깐이면 충분합니다.

담배 업계에 경고하는 또 다른 방법
  1. Beverly Hills City Ordinance No. 19-O-2783. June, 2019. Accessed June, 2024. https://www.beverlyhills.org/DocumentCenter/View/814/Ordinance-No-19-O-2783-PDF
  2. Action on Smoking & Health California. Phasing out the sale of tobacco products: Case Study Manhattan Beach. Updated September 2021, Accessed June, 2024. https://endtobaccoca.ash.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/CS_ManhattanBeach_V1_Final.pdf
  3. Philip Morris International. New study shows e-cigarette’s disease risk-reduction potential. Published March 13, 2019. Accessed September 12, 2024. https://www.pmi.com/our-science/six-month-apoe-vapor-study
  4. Pisinger C, Godtfredsen N, Bender AM. A conflict of interest is strongly associated with tobacco industry–favourable results, indicating no harm of e-cigarettes. Preventive Medicine. 2019;119:124-131. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.011
  5. Aherrera A, Lin JJ, Chen R, et al. Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor. Environ Health Perspect. 2023;131(12):127004. doi:10.1289/EHP11921
  6. American Cancer Society. Known and probable human carcinogens. Updated August 1, 2024. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/understanding-cancer-risk/known-and-probable-human-carcinogens.html
  7. Fowles J, Barreau T, Wu N. Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062146. PMID: 32213824; PMCID: PMC7142621.
  8. Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2014;23(2):133-139.
  9. Hess CA, Olmedo P, Navas-Acien A, Goessler W, Cohen JE, Rule AM. E-cigarettes as a source of toxic and potentially carcinogenic metals. Environ Res. 2017;152:221-225. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.09.026
  10. Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Fik M, et al. Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(10):1319-1326. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu078
  11. Liu Q, Huang C, Chris Le X. Arsenic species in electronic cigarettes: Determination and potential health risk. J Environ Sci (China). 2020;91:168-176. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.023
  12. National Cancer Institute. Arsenic. Updated December 5, 2022. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/arsenic
  13. National Cancer Institute. Chemical and Environmental Exposures: Arsenic. Updated March 2024. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/prevention/chemical_exposures/arsenic
  14. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Published 2016. Accessed April 17, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538680/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK538680.pdf
  15. Olmedo P, Goessler W, Tanda S, et al. Metal Concentrations in e-Cigarette Liquid and Aerosol Samples: The Contribution of Metallic Coils. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(2):027010. Published 2018 Feb 21. doi:10.1289/EHP2175
  16. Proposition 65. Lead and Lead Components. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/lead-and-lead-compounds
  17. Salamanca, J.C., Meehan-Atrash, J., Vreeke, S. et al. E-cigarettes can emit formaldehyde at high levels under conditions that have been reported to be non-averse to users. Sci Rep 8, 7559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25907-6
  18. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Formaldehyde: evidence of carcinogenicity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated June 6, 2014. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/81-111/default.html
  19. Williams M, Bozhilov K, Ghai S, Talbot P. Elements including metals in the atomizer and aerosol of disposable electronic cigarettes and electronic hookahs. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175430. Published 2017 Apr 17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175430
  20. World Health Organization. Arsenic: Key facts. Updated December 7, 2022. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic
  21. Zhao S, Zhang X, Wang J, Lin J, Cao D, Zhu M. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of organic compounds and heavy metals in electronic cigarettes. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):16046. Published 2023 Sep 25. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43112-
  22. Neuling H. Key state-specific tobacco-related data & rankings. Updated January 3, 2024. Accessed March 22, 2024. https://assets.tobaccofreekids.org/factsheets/0176.pdf
  23. California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Prevention Program. California Tobacco Facts and Figures 2024. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health; May 2024. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/ResearchandEvaluation/FactsandFigures/CaliforniaTobaccoFactsAndFigures_2024.pdf
  24. California Cancer Registry. Age-adjusted invasive cancer incidence rates in California; lung and bronchus, 1988-2017. Accessed June 24, 2024. https://www.ccrcal.org/retrieve-data/data-library/#273-205-statistical-tables-1665511786
  25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Office on Smoking and Health, 1988. Accessed August 15, 2024. https://digirepo.nlm.nih.gov/ext/document/101584932X423/PDF/101584932X423.pdf  
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nicotine: System Agent. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Updated May 12, 2011. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750028.html
  27. Mishra A, Chaturvedi P, Datta S, Sinukumar S, Joshi P, Garg A. Harmful effects of nicotine. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015;36(1):24-31. doi:10.4103/0971-5851.151771
  28. Abreu-Villaça Y, Seidler FJ, Tate CA, Slotkin TA. Nicotine is a neurotoxin in the adolescent brain: critical periods, patterns of exposure, regional selectivity, and dose thresholds for macromolecular alterations. Brain Res. 2003;979(1-2):114-128. doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02885-3
  29. Goriounova NA, Mansvelder HD. Short- and long-term consequences of nicotine exposure during adolescence for prefrontal cortex neuronal network function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(12):a012120. Published 2012 Dec 1. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012120
  30. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165.
  31. Slaughter E, Gersberg RM, Watanabe K, Rudolph J, Stransky C, Novotny TE. Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish [published correction appears in Tob Control. 2011 Nov;20(6):418]. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i25–i29. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.040170.
  32. Break Free From Plastic. Branded Vol. III Demanding corporate accountability for plastic pollution. Brand Audit 2020. Published 2020. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://brandaudit.breakfreefromplastic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/BFFP-Brand-Audit-Report-2020.pdf.
  33. Poma A, Vecchiotti G, Colafarina S, et al. In Vitro Genotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles on the Human Fibroblast Hs27 Cell Line. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(9):1299. Published 2019 Sep 11. doi:10.3390/nano9091299 doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01441.
  34. Tobacco sales: flavored tobacco ban 2023. Assembly Bill No. 935. Accessed June, 2024. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB935
  35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2014. Accessed August 15, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179276/
  36. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Designed for addiction: How the tobacco industry has made cigarettes more addictive, more attractive to kids and even more deadly. Published June 23, 2014. Accessed August 15, 2024. https://assets.tobaccofreekids.org/content/what_we_do/industry_watch/product_manipulation/2014_06_19_DesignedforAddiction_web.pdf
  37. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2020. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission. October, 2021. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.ftc.gov/reports/federal-trade-commission-cigarette-report-2020-smokeless-tobacco-report-2020
  38. OpenSecrets. Industry Profile: Tobacco. Opensecrets.org. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2021&id=A02. Accessed March 16, 2022.
  39. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the surgeon general. Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2006. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/research/apr/reports/l4000a.pdf
  40. UCSF Industry Documents Library. Younger adult smokers: strategies and opportunities. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Published February 29, 1984. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rkvk0045
  41. Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):ii20-ii28. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.041939.
  42. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010.
  43. Jacob H, Besson M, Swarzenski PW, Lecchini D, Metian M. Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(8):4733-4745. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05995
  44. Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Evidence for bisphenol A-induced female infertility: a review (2007-2016). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):827-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.027.
  45. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. Published 2020 Feb 13. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212.