正在進行中
加州禁止販售絕大多數的煙草產品
了解法律
立即戒煙發聲表達意見
分享
立即戒煙
當你瀏覽本網站之時

煙草商正在摧毀我們所愛之人及所愛的地方

他們耗費數十億美元說服我們這一切正常1

危害程度
Photo with no alt text
Photo with no alt text
Photo with no alt text
加州口味煙草禁令

口味煙草滾開 拯救生命展開

新法律終止了大多數口味煙草產品的販售，包括電子煙及薄荷醇香煙，並有助於保護所有加州人免受終生致命的毒癮，尤其對我們的孩子而言更是如此！

了解法律
煙草零售商新法

販售口味煙草現屬非法行為

加州新法律禁止零售商販售大多數的口味煙草產品，包括電子煙及薄荷醇香煙。遵守法律以避免罰款，並可挽救生命。

遵守法律
口味煙草與你的孩子

大煙草商如何創造出年輕人吸電子煙大流行

青少年吸電子煙的可能性是成年人的 7 倍，67 其中有96%使用口味產品。8 加州新的口味煙草法律可保護孩子們終生遠離致命的毒癮。

了解如何保護孩子
薄荷醇香煙及黑人社區

我們並非獲利工具

長期以來，大煙草商一直在策略性地使用薄荷醇香煙殘殺黑人社區。910 加州新的口味煙草法律之聚焦重點在於煙草零售商，而非煙草使用者。

獲知詳情(英文網站)

有關二手煙危害的個人故事

煙草商所造成的危害

煙草商目前耗資數十億美元在狡詐的營銷策略11及政治影響力12上，即使造成死亡與疾病也要獲利。
了解詳情
即使對於不使用煙草的人，也可能產生致命的後果。13
了解詳情
煙草商稱孩子們為「替代客戶」，14 而大煙草商更判處他們終生成癮與疾病。
了解詳情
具有種族主義的煙草商，策略性地以特定社區為目標，提供致命的產品及操控性的信息。15
環境破壞
有毒煙草廢棄物及所造成的塑料污染帶來環境破壞16與健康風險1718192021，無人能免受其害。22
了解詳情
Photo with no alt text

認識我們

我們是屬於加州公共衛生部的一項計劃，自1988年以來一直致力於對抗煙草商。我們極力終結煙草商的影響、保護環境、修復煙草商的不公平待遇，並已挽救超過100萬加州人的生命，而且還在一直不斷增加之中。

我們的工作

相關新聞 (英文)

How Big Tobacco used George Floyd and Eric Garner to stoke fear among Black smokers
Photo with no alt text
Cigarette butts are toxic plastic pollution. Should they be banned?
Photo with no alt text
Puff, puff pass: a new vape with hazy origins takes JUUL's place
Photo with no alt text
FDA says more than 5 million electronic cigarettes must be taken off the market
Photo with no alt text
Times of San Diego: E-Cigarettes Alter Body’s Organs, UC San Diego Research Team Finds
Photo with no alt text
Edge Media Network: Big Tobacco' Companies Leave Legacy of High LGBTQ Smoking Rates
Photo with no alt text
In a First, California Plans to Clean Up Microplastics
Photo with no alt text
Microplastics in the human body: What we know and don't know
Photo with no alt text
FDA considers banning menthol cigarettes
Photo with no alt text
FDA proposes ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars
Photo with no alt text
Photo with no alt text

追究煙草商責任

對於其他有害產品，加州已在保護大眾避免受到侵害，2324 現在正是該以同樣標準對待煙草商的時候！

更多方式告訴煙草商你再也無法忍受！
  1. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2020. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission. 2021.
  2. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165.
  3. Smith M, Love DC, Rochman CM, Neff RA. Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018;5(3):375-386. doi:10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z.
  4. Schwabl P, Köppel S, Königshofer P, et al. Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool: A Prospective Case Series. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(7):453-457. doi:10.7326/M19-0618.
  5. Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Human Consumption of Microplastics [published correction appears in Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Sep 1;54(17):10974]. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(12):7068-7074. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b01517.
  6. Mirbolouk M, Charkhchi P, Kianoush S, et al. Prevalence and Distribution of E-Cigarette Use Among U.S. Adults: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2016. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):429-438. doi:10.7326/M17-3440.
  7. Gentzke AS, Creamer M, Cullen KA, et al. Vital Signs: Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2011–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(6):157-164. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6806e1.
  8. Zhu S-H, Braden K, Zhuang Y-L, Braden K, Gamst A, Cole AG, Wolfson T, Li S. (2021). Results of the Statewide 2019-20 California Student Tobacco Survey. San Diego, California: Center for Research and Intervention in Tobacco Control (CRITC), University of California San Diego.
  9. Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):ii20-ii28. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.041939.
  10. Robinson RG, Sutton CD, James DA, Orleans CT. Pathways to Freedom: Winning the Fight against Tobacco. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 2003.
  11. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2020. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission. 2021.
  12. OpenSecrets. Industry Profile: Tobacco. Opensecrets.org. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2021&id=A02. Accessed March 16, 2022.
  13. Office on Smoking and Health (US). The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2006.
  14. RJ Reynolds. Younger Adult Smokers: Strategies and Opportunities. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rkvk0045. 1984 February 29.
  15. Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):ii20-ii28. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.041939.
  16. Break Free From Plastic. Branded Vol. III: Demanding corporate accountability for plastic pollution. 2020.
  17. Poma A, Vecchiotti G, Colafarina S, et al. In Vitro Genotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles on the Human Fibroblast Hs27 Cell Line. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(9):1299. Published 2019 Sep 11. doi:10.3390/nano9091299.
  18. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010.
  19. Jacob H, Besson M, Swarzenski PW, Lecchini D, Metian M. Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(8):4733-4745. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05995
  20. Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Evidence for bisphenol A-induced female infertility: a review (2007-2016). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):827-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.027.
  21. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. Published 2020 Feb 13. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212.
  22. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165.
  23. Governor Newsom Signs Legislation Making California First in the Nation to Ban Toxic Chemicals in Cosmetics [press release]. gov.ca.gov. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/30/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-making-california-first-in-the-nation-to-ban-toxic-chemicals-in-cosmetics/. Published September 30, 2020. Accessed March 23, 2022.
  24. Landmark California law bans 'forever chemicals' in products for infants, children [press release]. ewg.org. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news-release/2021/10/landmark-california-law-bans-forever-chemicals-products-infants. Published October 5, 2021. Accessed March 23, 2022.
  25. World Health Organization. Tobacco and its environmental impact: an overview. Geneva: World Health.
  26. Organization;2017.
  27. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165.