立即戒煙
分享
我們的使命我們的工作我們的影響
加入我們的行列
我們的使命我們的工作我們的影響

我們的使命

沒有煙草商的加州，並非只是理想，已經在你我身邊逐步實現。12

UNDO為加州公共衛生部的一項計劃，更是引領全美的公共衛生計劃之一，致力於終結煙草商在加州所造成的致命病態流行。我們日日都在努力終結煙草業的危害，以恢復每位加州人的健康與福祉。因為我們所有人都有權生活在擁有清淨空氣和水，並免受煙草業所造成的死亡、疾病和有毒廢棄物侵害影響的健康社區中。345678 孩子們更應該在未來不受煙草商毒害的情況下成長。

30多年來，加州一直是打擊煙草商的先鋒。91011 每當我們採取行動，就會有其他人跟隨，但我們仍尚未抵達終點。

通過我們的社區參與、成癮干預、研究以及大膽積極的公共教育活動，UNDO天天都在努力支持加州社區建立更健康的未來。我們的目標是：

  1. 消除煙草業在加州所造成的影響。這些影響遍及法律、政治人物和經濟；
  2. 終結加州的煙草病態流行，通過幫助大眾戒煙，並打擊煙草業對於維持客戶及引誘新客戶的努力；
  3. 讓所有加州社區能擺脫煙草商的產品、有毒廢棄物及二手煙的影響。採用令煙草產品變得不受歡迎、不可接受和難以獲得的方法。

沒有煙草商的加州，並非只是理想，已經在你我身邊逐步實現。12 加州目前正在終結煙草商所造成的致命病態流行，讓我們攜手努力，歡迎加入我們的行列。

“

煙草商以我們為目標，我們就以他們為目標全力反擊。

LAYLA、GALIA及LIZZIE — 聖地牙哥，加州

三名高中生將她們對於尼古丁危害的憤怒，轉化為反煙草倡導行動。

閱讀更多內容
“

我開始吸電子煙是為了減輕壓力，我決定戒煙是為了我的兒子。

ISAIAH — 洛杉磯，加州

他是一名年輕士兵，為了應對軍旅生活的壓力而開始吸電子煙，後來為了成為孩子的好榜樣而決定戒煙。

閱讀更多內容
“

我們正在從煙草商手中重拾我們的文化。

ANNELIA — 尤拉克部落 – 尤拉克郡縣，加州
她是一名美洲原住民婦女，幫助自己的社區重新恢復並保護其神聖的煙草傳統，以避免受到煙草商侵害。
閱讀更多內容

我們的工作帶來影響

超過100萬

已挽救超過100萬人生命12131415

兩個加州城市

已終止販售口味煙草12

下降42%

加州的肺癌罹患率已下降42%16
獲得更多影響數據

閱讀更多有關我們的工作和成就

Photo with no alt text

進行探索

我們的工作
我們的工作是將關心並想保護社區和家人遠離煙草商病態流行的加州人凝聚在一起。從社區參與、教育宣傳，到研究報告，我們為加州人提供對抗煙草業的有力工具。
了解更多我們的工作
我們的影響
在過去三十年裡，我們在終結煙草業影響方面獲得很大進展。345 但這場爭戰仍尚未結束。
了解更多我們的影響

相關新聞 (英文)

Banning Menthol Cigarettes: California-Based Advocacy Group Joins Suit Against Federal Govt.
Photo with no alt text
Urged on by LGBTQ+ Activists, California Cities Weigh Stricter Smoking Rules
Photo with no alt text
Yurok Join War on Tobacco with unprecedented policy
Photo with no alt text
California’s Anti-Smoking Push Spurs Big Savings on Health Costs
Photo with no alt text
Supreme Court leaves California’s ban on flavored cigarettes in place
Photo with no alt text
Voters approve California law banning flavored tobacco
Photo with no alt text

煙草商所造成的危害

煙草商目前耗資數十億美元在狡詐的營銷策略及政治影響力上，即使造成死亡與疾病也要獲利。1718
了解詳情
即使對於不使用煙草的人，也可能產生致命的後果。19
了解詳情
煙草商稱孩子們為「替代客戶」，而大煙草商更判處他們終生成癮與疾病。20
了解詳情
具有種族主義的煙草商，策略性地以特定社區為目標，提供致命的產品及操控性的信息。21
了解詳情
有毒煙草廢棄物及所造成的塑料污染帶來環境破壞與健康風險，無人能免受其害。22232425262728
了解詳情
Photo with no alt text

保護你所摯愛的人們與地方

立即發聲反對煙草商的危害
高聲疾呼
  1. Beverly Hills City Ordinance No. 19-O-2783. June, 2019. Accessed June, 2024. https://www.beverlyhills.org/DocumentCenter/View/814/Ordinance-No-19-O-2783-PDF
  2. Action on Smoking & Health California. Phasing out the sale of tobacco products: Case Study Manhattan Beach. Updated September 2021, Accessed June, 2024. https://endtobaccoca.ash.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/CS_ManhattanBeach_V1_Final.pdf
  3. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. The toll of tobacco in California. Updated June 13, 2024. Accessed July 1, 2024. https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/problem/toll-us/california
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Archive: Diseases and Death. Updated July 29, 2022. Accessed July 3, 2024. https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/diseases-and-death.html
  5. Hendlin YH. Alert: Public Health Implications of Electronic Cigarette Waste. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(11):1489-1490. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304699
  6. Novotny TE, Bialous SA, Burt L, et al. The environmental and health impacts of tobacco agriculture, cigarette manufacture and consumption. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(12):877-880. doi:10.2471/BLT.15.152744
  7. Novotny TE, Slaughter E. Tobacco Product Waste: An Environmental Approach to Reduce Tobacco Consumption. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1(3):208-216. Published 2014 May 6. doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0016-x
  8. Krause MJ, Townsend TG. Hazardous waste status of discarded electronic cigarettes. Waste Manag. 2015;39:57-62. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.005
  9. Roeseler A, Burns D. The quarter that changed the world. Tobacco control. 2010; 19(Suppl 1), doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030809
  10. Tobacco Industry Efforts to Influence Tobacco Control Media Interventions. Monograph 19: The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Published June 2020. Accessed March 11, 2024. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/m19_1.pdf
  11. "Master Settlement Agreement" (PDF). National Association of Attorneys General. 1998. https://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/master-settlement-agreement.pdf
  12. California's award-winning tobacco control program marks its 20th anniversary. News release. California Department of Public Health; April 7, 2009. https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2009/04/07/1184068/0/en/California-s-Award-Winning-Tobacco-Control-Program-Marks-Its-20th-Anniversary.html
  13. United Health Foundation. America's Health Rankings Analysis of CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. AmericasHealthRankings.org. Accessed May 17, 2024. https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/measures/Smoking/CA
  14. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 2. Accessed May 20, 2024. https://data.census.gov/table/DECENNIALDPSF22000.DP1
  15. U.S. Census Bureau. 2020 Census Demographic Profile. Accessed May 20, 2024. https://data.census.gov/table/DECENNIALDP2020.DP1
  16. California Cancer Registry. Age-adjusted invasive cancer incidence rates in California; lung and bronchus, 1988-2017. Accessed June 24, 2024. https://www.ccrcal.org/retrieve-data/data-library/#273-205-statistical-tables-166551178
  17. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2020. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission. October, 2021. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.ftc.gov/reports/federal-trade-commission-cigarette-report-2020-smokeless-tobacco-report-2020
  18. Open Secrets. Industry Profile: Tobacco. Summary of 2021. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2021&id=A02
  19. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the surgeon general. Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2006. Accessed July 10, 2024.
  20. UCSF Industry Documents Library. Younger adult smokers: strategies and opportunities. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Published February 29, 1984. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rkvk0045
  21. Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):ii20-ii28. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.041939
  22. Break Free From Plastic. Branded Vol. III Demanding corporate accountability for plastic pollution. Brand Audit 2020. Published 2020. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://brandaudit.breakfreefromplastic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/BFFP-Brand-Audit-Report-2020.pdf.
  23. Poma A, Vecchiotti G, Colafarina S, et al. In Vitro Genotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles on the Human Fibroblast Hs27 Cell Line. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(9):1299. Published 2019 Sep 11. doi:10.3390/nano9091299
  24. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010.
  25. Jacob H, Besson M, Swarzenski PW, Lecchini D, Metian M. Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(8):4733-4745. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05995
  26. Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Evidence for bisphenol A-induced female infertility: a review (2007-2016). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):827-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.027
  27. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. Published 2020 Feb 13. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212
  28. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165