Undo
立即戒煙發聲表達意見
分享
立即戒煙
Photo with no alt text

煙草商的雙手已沾滿血腥 – 即使不使用煙草的人也同樣受害

煙草商的產品有一個可怕的共同點：它們會導致疾病、殘疾和死亡。15 某名幼兒因香煙煙霧而導致哮喘發作時大口喘氣。1617 某位青少年因吸電子煙而導致胸痛和呼吸急促而住院。18 另有人因尼古丁成癮而感到焦慮和抑鬱。19 某個家庭埋葬了死於肺癌的至愛親人。

煙草商每天殺死110位加州人，另有30多人受到與煙草相關疾病的痛苦。2021 為何我們要將這一切視為正常？

了解真相
我們的活動

二手煙危害

香煙煙霧及來自電子煙的蒸氣，含有可導致癌症和生殖危害的化學物質。不論在工作場所、家中，甚至戶外，大眾都有接觸二手煙可能，這也使每個人都面臨風險罹患肺癌和其他嚴重健康問題。

了解詳情

更多內容

煙草商所造成的危害

煙草商目前耗資數十億美元在狡詐的營銷策略1及政治影響力2上，即使造成死亡與疾病也要獲利。
了解詳情
即使對於不使用煙草的人，也可能產生致命的後果。3
了解詳情
煙草商稱孩子們為「替代客戶」，4 而大煙草商更判處他們終生成癮與疾病。
了解詳情
具有種族主義的煙草商，策略性地以特定社區為目標，提供致命的產品及操控性的信息。5
了解詳情
有毒煙草廢棄物及所造成的塑料污染帶來環境破壞6與健康風險7891011，無人能免受其害。12
了解詳情
Photo with no alt text

追究煙草商責任

對於其他有害產品，加州已在保護大眾避免受到侵害，1314 現在正是該以同樣標準對待煙草商的時候！
更多方式告訴煙草商你再也無法忍受！
  1. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2020. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission. 2021.
  2. OpenSecrets. Industry Profile: Tobacco. Opensecrets.org. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2021&id=A02. Accessed March 16, 2022.
  3. Office on Smoking and Health (US). The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2006.
  4. RJ Reynolds. Younger Adult Smokers: Strategies and Opportunities. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rkvk0045. 1984 February 29.
  5. Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):ii20-ii28. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.041939.
  6. Break Free From Plastic. Branded Vol. III: Demanding corporate accountability for plastic pollution. 2020.
  7. Poma A, Vecchiotti G, Colafarina S, et al. In Vitro Genotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles on the Human Fibroblast Hs27 Cell Line. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(9):1299. Published 2019 Sep 11. doi:10.3390/nano9091299.
  8. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010.
  9. Jacob H, Besson M, Swarzenski PW, Lecchini D, Metian M. Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(8):4733-4745. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05995.
  10. Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Evidence for bisphenol A-induced female infertility: a review (2007-2016). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):827-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.027.
  11. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. Published 2020 Feb 13. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212.
  12. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165.
  13. Governor Newsom Signs Legislation Making California First in the Nation to Ban Toxic Chemicals in Cosmetics [press release]. gov.ca.gov. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/30/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-making-california-first-in-the-nation-to-ban-toxic-chemicals-in-cosmetics/. Published September 30, 2020. Accessed March 23, 2022.
  14. Landmark California law bans 'forever chemicals' in products for infants, children [press release]. ewg.org. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news-release/2021/10/landmark-california-law-bans-forever-chemicals-products-infants. Published October 5, 2021. Accessed March 23, 2022.
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fast Facts. cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm. Accessed March 23, 2022.
  16. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2005.
  17. Wang Z, May SM, Charoenlap S, et al. Effects of secondhand smoke exposure on asthma morbidity and health care utilization in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(5):396-401.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.08.005
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with the Use of E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Products. cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html. Updated February 25, 2020. Accessed March 24, 2022.
  19. Office of the Surgeon General. E-cigarette Use among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General [PDF–8.47 MB]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016.
  20. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2005.
  21. Jackler RK, Ramamurthi D. Nicotine arms race: JUUL and the high-nicotine product market. Tob Control. February 2019:tobaccocontrol-2018-054796. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054796.
  22. Truth Initiative. How Big Tobacco made cigarettes more addictive. truthintiative.org. https://truthinitiative.org/research-resources/harmful-effects-tobacco/how-big-tobacco-made-cigarettes-more-addictive. Published January 23, 2018. Accessed March 24, 2022.