지금 금연하세요
공유하기
환상의 나라
베이핑의 위험성베이핑에 관한 진실변화를 만드세요
지금 금연하세요
베이핑의 위험성베이핑에 관한 진실변화를 만드세요
Photo with no alt text

담배 기업이 만든 니코틴 악몽에 오신 것을 환영합니다.

이곳은 담배와 니코틴 기업에겐 천국과 같습니다. 여러분을 중독시켜 돈을 벌죠. 베이프에 비소, 납, 포름알데히드와 같은 발암 물질이 포함될 수 있다는 사실은 전혀 상관하지 않습니다.1234567891011121314

베이핑의 위험성

베이핑이 몸과 뇌에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 알아보세요.21516171819202122232425262728

고함량 니코틴 베이프는 더 빨리 중독을 일으킬 뿐 아니라 암, 심장병, 만성 폐쇄성 폐 질환(COPD) 및 뇌졸중 위험을 증가시킬 수 있습니다.2151617181920212223242526293031323334

눌러서 건강에 해로운 점을 확인하세요
베이핑이 몸과 뇌에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 알아보세요.[2][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]
니코틴은 뇌를 영구적으로 손상시키고 불안, 우울증, 감정 기복을 증가시킬 수 있습니다.273536373839
베이핑은 뇌졸중 위험을 증가시켜 어린 나이에 뇌졸중으로 사망할 가능성을 높입니다.25264041
베이핑은 잇몸 조직을 자극하여 잇몸 질환을 유발할 수 있으며, 입냄새의 원인이 될 수 있습니다.424344
베이프에는 발암 물질인 비소, 납, 포름알데히드가 포함될 수 있습니다.1234567891011121314
베이핑은 만성 폐쇄성 폐 질환(COPD), 폐기종, 기관지염과 같은 호흡기 질환 발병 위험을 증가시킵니다.4546
매일 베이핑을 하는 사람은 비흡연자에 비해 심장마비에 걸릴 가능성이 더 높습니다.34
장기간의 베이핑은 혈관을 손상시켜 심혈관 질환의 위험을 증가시킬 수 있습니다.47
베이프는 방광암과 관련 있습니다.4849
베이핑에 관한 진실

무엇이 숨겨져 있을까요?

베이프는 생각보다 훨씬 더 위험합니다.

Photo with no alt text
A black and white portrait of a young man - asian
화학물질

비소도 곁들여 드릴까요?1236

사실 확인하기
화학물질

베이프의 독성 화학물질은 암 발생 위험을 높일 수 있습니다.

베이프에는 납, 비소, 포름알데히드와 같은 발암 물질이 포함될 수 있습니다.1234567891011121314 베이프 에어로졸 간접 흡입시에도 크롬, 니켈, 망간, 납과 같은 중금속이 방출되어 친구와 가족을 위험에 빠뜨릴 수 있습니다.8505152535455555657

베이프의 유해성은 한두 가지가 아닙니다
Photo with no alt text
A black and white portrait of a woman wearing a jean jacket
피해

니코틴과 베이핑은 건강을 망칩니다.

사실 확인하기
피해

몸과 뇌는 그 대가를, 어쩌면 평생 동안 치르게 될 수도 있습니다.

니코틴은 우울증과 불안을 악화시키고 뇌의 연결 방식을 영구적으로 변형시킬 수 있는 독성 물질입니다.273536373839 뿐만 아니라 베이핑을 하는 사람은 뇌졸중으로 조기에 사망할 위험이 더 높습니다.25264041 결코 바람직한 일이 아니죠.

니코틴이 뇌에 미치는 더 많은 악영향을 알아보세요

베이핑은 치명적인 질병의 위험을 높일 수 있습니다.21516171819202122232425263031323334 친구와 사랑하는 사람들을 보호하기 위해 이 사실을 널리 알려주세요.

“

아들이 제 베이프를 흡입하려는 걸 봤어요. 녀석은 저랑 똑 닮았어요. 제가 하는 모든 걸 따라 하죠. 그때 깨달았습니다. 담배를 끊어야만 한다는 걸."

이사야 — 로스앤젤레스
“

베이핑을 하면 더 불안해지고 항상 뭔가를 더 갈망하는 느낌이 들어요."

Z세대 캘리포니아 주민
“

어렸을 때, 베이핑이 더 안전한 대안이라고 들었어요. 지금은 더 안전하다고 절대 생각하지 않아요."

Z세대 캘리포니아 주민
변화를 만드세요

아직 여러분의 대학 캠퍼스에서 담배와 니코틴이 사라지지 않았나요?

캘리포니아 청소년 권익 네트워크(California Youth Advocacy Network)의 대학 프로그램은 대학 커뮤니티 내 담배와 니코틴으로 인한 피해를 없애기 위해 학생 및 교수진과 협력하고 있습니다.

담배와 니코틴 없는 캠퍼스를 만들어 보세요 (영어 웹사이트)
니코틴을 끊으세요

EX 프로그램으로 니코틴을 극복하고 지속 가능한 금연법을 찾으세요

유용한 팁과 조언이 가득한 일일 문자 메시지, 전문가의 지침이 담긴 자료실, 그리고 활발한 금연 커뮤니티에 접속할 수 있는 24시간 연중무휴 무료 지원을 받아보세요.

지금 금연하세요 (영어 웹사이트)
Photo with no alt text

더 많은 정보를 확인하세요

Photo with no alt text
간단한 퀴즈

다음 중 니코틴 베이핑으로 인해 피해를 입는 사람은:

Photo with no alt text

기관 소개

담배 기업 없는 캘리포니아는 가능성을 넘어 이미 실현되고 있습니다. 우리는 모두 함께, 담배 산업의 전염병을 퇴치하고 있습니다. 캘리포니아 공중 보건부의 프로그램인 UNDO는 담배 기업의 치명적인 전염병을 캘리포니아에서 종식시키기 위해 싸우는, 미국 최고의 공중 보건 프로그램 중 하나입니다.

우리의 사명에 대해 더 알아보세요

담배 기업의 악영향에 대해 더 알아보세요

담배 기업은 지금도 죽음과 질병으로부터 이익을 얻기 위해 능수능란한 마케팅 전략과 정치적 영향력 확대에 수십억 달러를 투자합니다.5960
자세히 알아보기
심지어 담배를 흡연하지 않는 사람들에게도 치명적인 결과를 가져옵니다.61
자세히 알아보기
담배 기업은 어린이를 “대체 고객”이라고 부릅니다. 그들은 어린이에게 평생 중독과 질병을 선고합니다.62
자세히 알아보기
이 인종차별적이고 불공정한 기업은 전략적으로 치명적인 제품과 교묘한 메시지로 특정 지역사회를 겨냥해 왔습니다.63
자세히 알아보기
누구도 독성 담배 폐기물과 플라스틱 오염으로 인한 환경 피해와 건강 위험으로부터 안전하지 않습니다.64656667686970
자세히 알아보기
  1. Aherrera A, Lin JJ, Chen R, et al. Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor. Environ Health Perspect. 2023;131(12):127004. doi:10.1289/EHP11921
  2. Fowles J, Barreau T, Wu N. Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062146. PMID: 32213824; PMCID: PMC7142621.
  3. Liu Q, Huang C, Chris Le X. Arsenic species in electronic cigarettes: Determination and potential health risk. J Environ Sci (China). 2020;91:168-176. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.023
  4. National Cancer Institute. Arsenic. Updated December 5, 2022. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/arsenic
  5. World Health Organization. Arsenic: Key facts. Updated December 7, 2022. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic
  6. Zhao S, Zhang X, Wang J, Lin J, Cao D, Zhu M. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of organic compounds and heavy metals in electronic cigarettes. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):16046. Published 2023 Sep 25. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43112-y
  7. American Cancer Society. Known and probable human carcinogens. Updated August 1, 2024. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/understanding-cancer-risk/known-and-probable-human-carcinogens.html
  8. Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2014;23(2):133-139. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859
  9. Hess CA, Olmedo P, Navas-Acien A, Goessler W, Cohen JE, Rule AM. E-cigarettes as a source of toxic and potentially carcinogenic metals. Environ Res. 2017;152:221-225. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.09.026
  10. Proposition 65. Lead and Lead Components. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/lead-and-lead-compounds
  11. Williams M, Bozhilov K, Ghai S, Talbot P. Elements including metals in the atomizer and aerosol of disposable electronic cigarettes and electronic hookahs. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175430. Published 2017 Apr 17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175430
  12. Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Fik M, et al. Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(10):1319-1326. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu078
  13. Salamanca, J.C., Meehan-Atrash, J., Vreeke, S. et al. E-cigarettes can emit formaldehyde at high levels under conditions that have been reported to be non-averse to users. Sci Rep 8, 7559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25907-6
  14. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Formaldehyde: evidence of carcinogenicity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated June 6, 2014. Accessed March 25, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/81-111/default.html
  15. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on the Review of the Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Eaton DL, Kwan LY, Stratton K, editors. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018 Jan 23. 10, Cancers. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507174/
  16. The Impact of E-Cigarettes on the Lung. American Lung Association. Published February 24, 2020. Updated May 31, 2023. Accessed August 15, 2023. https://www.lung.org/quit-smoking/e-cigarettes-vaping/impact-of-e-cigarettes-on-lung
  17. Bein K, Leikauf GD. Acrolein - a pulmonary hazard. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55(9):1342-1360. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201100279
  18. Hikisz P, Jacenik D. The tobacco smoke component, acrolein, as a major culprit in lung diseases and respiratory cancers: molecular mechanisms of acrolein cytotoxic activity. Cells. 2023;12(6):879. doi:10.3390/cells12060879
  19. Bracken-Clarke D, Kapoor D, Baird AM, Buchanan PJ, Gately K, Cuffe S, Finn SP. Vaping and lung cancer - A review of current data and recommendations. Lung Cancer. 2021;153:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.12.030.
  20. Shehata SA, Toraih EA, Ismail EA, Hagras AM, Elmorsy E, Fawzy MS. Vaping, Environmental Toxicants Exposure, and Lung Cancer Risk. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(18):4525. Published 2023 Sep 12. doi:10.3390/cancers15184525 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526315/
  21. Gotts JE, Jordt SE, McConnell R, Tarran R. What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes? BMJ. 2019;366:l5275. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5275.
  22. Auschwitz E, Almeda J, Andl CD. Mechanisms of E-Cigarette Vape-Induced Epithelial Cell Damage. Cells. 2023;12(21):2552. doi: 10.3390/cells12212552.
  23. Tommasi S, Blumenfeld H, Besaratinia A. Vaping Dose, Device Type, and E-Liquid Flavor are Determinants of DNA Damage in Electronic Cigarette Users. Nicotine Tob Res. 2023;25(6):1145-1154. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad003.
  24. Shields PG, Berman M, Brasky TM, et al. A Review of Pulmonary Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes in the Context of Smoking: A Focus on Inflammation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(8):1175-1191. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0358
  25. Patel U, Patel N, Khurana M, et al. Effect Comparison of E-Cigarette and Traditional Smoking and Association with Stroke—A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES. Neurol Int.. 2022;14(2):441-452. doi:10.3390/neurolint14020037
  26. Poisson SN, Glidden D, Johnston SC, Fullerton HJ. Deaths from stroke in US young adults, 1989-2009. Neurology. 2014;83(23):2110-2115. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001042
  27. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2016.
  28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Surgeon General. (2018). Surgeon General’s advisory on e-cigarette use among youth. Retrieved from https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/documents/surgeon-generals-advisory-on-e-cigarette-use-among-youth-2018.pdf
  29. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. High Nicotine E-Cigarettes are Addicting a New Generation of Youth. Accessed April 30, 2025. https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/us-resources/fact-sheet/juul-and-other-high-nicotine-e-cigarettes-are-addicting-a-new-generation-of-youth
  30. Tsai M, Byun MK, Shin J, Crotty Alexander LE. Effects of e-cigarettes and vaping devices on cardiac and pulmonary physiology. J Physiol. 2020 Nov;598(22):5039-5062. doi: 10.1113/JP279754. Epub 2020 Oct 12. PMID: 32975834.
  31. Berlowitz JB, Xie W, Harlow AF, Hamburg NM, Blaha MJ, Bhatnagar A, Benjamin EJ, Stokes AC. E-Cigarette Use and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Longitudinal Analysis of the PATH Study (2013-2019). Circulation. 2022 May 17;145(20):1557-1559. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057369
  32. Abbasi J. The American Heart Association Takes on Vaping. JAMA. 2020 Jan 21;323(3):205-206. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20781. PMID: 31899479
  33. Wang Y, Zhu Y, Chen Z, Chen S, Fu G, Fu J. Association between electronic cigarettes use and whole blood cell among adults in the USA—a cross-sectional study of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int.2022;29(59):88531-88539. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21973-6
  34. Alzahrani, T., Pena, I., Temesgen, N., & Glantz, S. A. (2018). Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 455–461.
  35. Becker TD, Arnold MK, Ro V, Martin L, Rice TR. Systematic Review of Electronic Cigarette Use (Vaping) and Mental Health Comorbidity Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(3):415-425. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa171
  36. Kutlu MG, Gould TJ. Nicotine modulation of fear memories and anxiety: Implications for learning and anxiety disorders. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;97(4):498-511. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.07.029.
  37. Benowitz NL. Nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2295-303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0809890.
  38. Lechner WV, Janssen T, Kahler CW, Audrain-McGovern J, Leventhal AM. Bi-directional associations of electronic and combustible cigarette use onset patterns with depressive symptoms in adolescents. Prev Med. 2017;96:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.034.
  39. Hughes JR. Effects of abstinence from tobacco: Valid symptoms and time course. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(3):315-327. doi:10.1080/14622200701188919.
  40. Rutten-Jacobs LC, Arntz RM, Maaijwee NA, et al. Long-term mortality after stroke among adults aged 18 to 50 years. JAMA. 2013;309(11):1136-1144. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.842
  41. Cardenas HL, Evanoff NG, Fandl HK, et al. Endothelial-derived extracellular vesicles associated with electronic cigarette use impair cerebral microvascular cell function. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023;135(2):271-278. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00243.2023
  42. Pushalkar S, Paul B, Li Q, et al. Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Modulates the Oral Microbiome and Increases Risk of Infection. iScience. 2020;23(3):100884. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.100884
  43. Johns Hopkins Medicine. Halitosis (Bad Breath). Published April 24, 2025. Accessed April 24, 2025. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/halitosis-bad-breath
  44. Sundar IK, Javed F, Romanos GE, Rahman I. E-cigarettes and flavorings induce inflammatory and pro-senescence responses in oral epithelial cells and periodontal fibroblasts. Oncotarget. 2016;7(47):77196-77204. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12857
  45. Bhatta DN, Glantz SA. Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2020;58(2):182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.028.
  46. Osei, A.D., Mirbolouk, M., Orimoloye, O.A. et al. The association between e-cigarette use and asthma among never combustible cigarette smokers: behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS) 2016 & 2017. BMC Pulm Med 19, 180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0950-3
  47. Mohammadi L, Han DD, Xu F, et al. Chronic E-Cigarette Use Impairs Endothelial Function on the Physiological and Cellular Levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022;42(11):1333-1350. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.317749.
  48. Bjurlin MA, Matulewicz RS, Roberts TR, et al. Carcinogen biomarkers in the urine of electronic cigarette users and implications for the development of bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(5):766-783. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.004
  49. Molony RD, Wu CH, Lee YF. E-liquid exposure induces bladder cancer cells to release extracellular vesicles that promote non-malignant urothelial cell transformation. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):142. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27165-z
  50. Gray N, Halstead M, Valentin-Blasini L, Watson C, Pappas RS. Toxic Metals in Liquid and Aerosol from Pod-Type Electronic Cigarettes. J Anal Toxicol. 2022;46(1):69-75. doi:10.1093/jat/bkaa185
  51. Lee MS, LeBouf RF, Son YS, Koutrakis P, Christiani DC. Nicotine, aerosol particles, carbonyls and volatile organic compounds in tobacco- and menthol-flavored e-cigarettes. Environ Health. 2017;16(1):42. Published 2017 Apr 27. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0249-x
  52. Olmedo P, Goessler W, Tanda S, et al. Metal Concentrations in e-Cigarette Liquid and Aerosol Samples: The Contribution of Metallic Coils. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(2):027010. Published 2018 Feb 21. doi:10.1289/EHP2175
  53. Reilly SM, Cheng T, Feng C, Walters MJ. Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in E-Liquids and Aerosols from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). Chem Res Toxicol. 2024;37(7):1155-1170. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00093
  54. Ruprecht AA, De Marco C, Saffari A, et al. Environmental pollution and emission factors of electronic cigarettes, heat-not-burn tobacco products, and conventional cigarettes. Aerosol Sci Tech. 2017; 51(6):674-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1300231
  55. State of California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposition 65 list of carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Updated January 3, 2025. Accessed April 22, 2025. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/proposition-65/p65chemicalslist.pdf
  56. World Health Organization: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC monographs on the identification of carcinogenic hazards to humans. List of Classifications. Update April 16, 2025. Accessed April 22, 2025. https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classifications
  57. Zhao D, Navas-Acien A, Ilievski V, et al. Metal concentrations in electronic cigarette aerosol: Effect of open-system and closed-system devices and power settings. Environ Res. 2019;174:125-134. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.003
  58. Qasim H, Karim ZA, Rivera JO, Khasawneh FT, Alshbool FZ. Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on the Cardiovascular System. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(9):e006353. Published 2017 Aug 30. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006353.
  59. OpenSecrets. Industry Profile: Tobacco. Opensecrets.org. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2021&id=A02. Accessed March 16, 2022.
  60. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2020. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission. October, 2021. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.ftc.gov/reports/federal-trade-commission-cigarette-report-2020-smokeless-tobacco-report-2020
  61. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the surgeon general. Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2006. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/research/apr/reports/l4000a.pdf
  62. UCSF Industry Documents Library. Younger adult smokers: strategies and opportunities. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Published February 29, 1984. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rkvk0045
  63. Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2011;20(Suppl_2):ii20-ii28. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.041939.
  64. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165.
  65. Break Free From Plastic. Branded Vol. III Demanding corporate accountability for plastic pollution. Brand Audit 2020. Published 2020. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://brandaudit.breakfreefromplastic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/BFFP-Brand-Audit-Report-2020.pdf.
  66. Poma A, Vecchiotti G, Colafarina S, et al. In Vitro Genotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles on the Human Fibroblast Hs27 Cell Line. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(9):1299. Published 2019 Sep 11. doi:10.3390/nano9091299.
  67. Zarus GM, Muianga C, Hunter CM, Pappas RS. A review of data for quantifying human exposures to micro and nanoplastics and potential health risks. Sci Total Environ. 2021;756:144010. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144010.
  68. Jacob H, Besson M, Swarzenski PW, Lecchini D, Metian M. Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(8):4733-4745. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05995
  69. Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Evidence for bisphenol A-induced female infertility: a review (2007-2016). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):827-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.027.
  70. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1212. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041212.