立即戒煙
環境破壞

煙草產品廢棄物 對環境造成嚴重浩劫

發佈於 May 6, 2022
Photo with no alt text

這是我們都非常清楚的事情:具有操控性、種族主義及貪婪的煙草商,正在破壞我們所愛之人的健康。他們的產品若按照預期使用,將會致命並引發疾病,而且煙草商的產品不僅會損壞使用之人的健康,還會讓所有人都面臨接觸有毒二手煙的風險,進而導致加州每年有數千人致命。1
以下是煙草商不想讓我們知道的事情:他們是全球名列前茅的塑料污染者,其生產和製造直接導致氣候變化及森林砍伐。2 3 在煙草商產品中的有毒化學物質,已被正式歸入「有毒廢棄物」類別,使它們幾乎無法被安全丟棄處理。4 5 6 7 8 9

煙草商每年生產6萬億支香煙。10> 因此,煙蒂在地球上是被隨手亂扔最多的垃圾,11 在加州迄今為止也同樣位居榜首。每個香煙濾嘴都使用15,000根微塑料纖維製成,12 而迄今為止,會污染我們的食物、1314 和空氣。15] 正因微塑料是由塑料製成,因此可能需要數年的時間才能分解,16 並遺留堆積如山的有毒微塑料,污染我們的環境,甚至可能進入你我的身體裡面。煙蒂還富含砷及鉛等有毒化學物質,若被隨地亂扔,這些化學物質就會滲入環境之中,並威脅海洋及野生動物。17

煙草商對於傾倒於環境中未經檢查的有毒廢棄物數量,所承擔的責任為零。根據煙草商的內部文件,顯示他們用來掩蓋污染的謊言及公關宣傳,並希望我們將責任歸咎於煙草使用者的亂扔垃圾,讓煙草商可因此規避任何環境規章,18 9 20 21 但如此缺乏責任感的結果是每年耗費四千一百萬美元加州納稅人的錢。22

更令人驚訝的是:煙草商的新電子煙已經引發年輕人的電子煙流行病,電子煙與煙蒂存在同樣的所有環境問題,也就是塑料污染及有毒化學物質滲入環境之中。23 24 此外,由於電子煙屬於電子設備,因此還會遺留電子廢棄物,25 眾所周知處理起來相當困難且所費不貲。26

重點:沒有任何人,也沒有任何地方,可以安全遠離大煙草商的危害。

  1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment; 2005.
  2. Break Free From Plastic. Branded Vol. III: Demanding corporate accountability for plastic pollution. 2020.
  3. World Health Organization. Tobacco and its environmental impact: an overview. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
  4. Environmental Protection Agency (1980). CFR §261.33 Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof.
  5. Hendlin YH. Alert: Public Health Implications of Electronic Cigarette Waste. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(11):1489-1490. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304699
  6. Novotny TE, Slaughter E. Tobacco Product Waste: An Environmental Approach to Reduce Tobacco Consumption. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1(3):208-216. Published 2014 May 6. doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0016-x
  7. Krause MJ, Townsend TG. Hazardous waste status of discarded electronic cigarettes. Waste Manag. 2015;39:57-62. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.005
  8. Hendlin YH. E-cigarettes and a new threat: How to dispose of them [blog]. The Conversation. https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/e-cigarettes-and-new-threat-how-dispose-them. Published October 23, 2018. Accessed July 7, 2020.
  9. Slaughter E, Gersberg RM, Watanabe K, Rudolph J, Stransky C, Novotny TE. Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish [published correction appears in Tob Control. 2011 Nov;20(6):418]. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i25-i29. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.040170
  10. Novotny TE, Slaughter E. Tobacco Product Waste: An Environmental Approach to Reduce Tobacco Consumption. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1(3):208-216. Published 2014 May 6. doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0016-x
  11. Ocean Conservancy, International Coastal Cleanup. We Clean On, 2021 report. Washington, DC: Ocean Conservatory, International Coastal Cleanup; 2021.
  12. Belzagui F, Buscio V, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Vilaseca M. Cigarette butts as a microfiber source with a microplastic level of concern. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;762:144165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144165
  13. Rochman CM, Tahir A, Williams SL, et al. Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14340. doi:10.1038/srep14340
  14. Choy CA, Robison BH, Gagne TO et al. The vertical distribution and biological transport of marine microplastics across the epipelagic and mesopelagic water column. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7843. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44117-2
  15. Prata JC. Airborne microplastics: Consequences to human health?. Environ Pollut. 2018;234:115-126. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.043
  16. UC Berkeley, University Health Services. Facts about cigarette butts and smoke. uhs.berkeley.edu. https://uhs.berkeley.edu/tobaccofacts Accessed February 25, 2022.
  17. Novotny TE, Bialous SA, Burt L, et al. The environmental and health impacts of tobacco agriculture, cigarette manufacture and consumption. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(12):877-880. doi:10.2471/blt.15.152744
  18. WHITT DD. BEACH ANTI-LITTER PROGRAM. EXPANSION OF DAYTONA BEACH PROGRAM. RJ Reynolds Records; Master Settlement Agreement. 1991 May 06. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lxfb0082
  19. LITTER" (A PROPOSAL FOR TI POLICY). RJ Reynolds Records; Master Settlement Agreement. 1979 March 26. https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/yzdk0016
  20. Smith EA, McDaniel PA. Covering their Butts: Responses to the Cigarette Litter Problem. Tob Control. 2011;20(2):100. doi:10.1136/TC.2010.036491
  21. Smith EA, Novotny TE. Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste. Tob Control. 2011;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i2-i9. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.040105
  22. Martinez C. No ifs, ands or butts: California bill would ban single-use smoking products like cigarette filters. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-01-25/california-bill-would-ban-single-use-cigarette-filters. Pubished January 25, 2022.
  23. Krause MJ, Townsend TG. Hazardous waste status of discarded electronic cigarettes. Waste Manag. 2015;39:57-62. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.005
  24. Environmental Protection Agency (1980). CFR §261.33 Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2012-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2012-title40-vol27-sec261-33.pdf
  25. Hendlin YH. E-cigarettes and a new threat: How to dispose of them [blog]. The Conversation. https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/e-cigarettes-and-new-threat-how-dispose-them. Published October 23, 2018. Accessed July 7, 2020.
  26. Seeberger J, Grandhi R, Kim SS, et al. Special Report: E-Waste Management in the United States and Public Health Implications. J Environ Health. 2016;79(3):8-16.

按主題探索

煙草商目前耗資數十億美元在狡詐的營銷策略及政治影響力上,即使造成死亡與疾病也要獲利。
了解詳情
即使對於不使用煙草的人,也可能產生致命的後果。
了解詳情
煙草商稱孩子們為「替代客戶」, 而大煙草商更判處他們終生成癮與疾病。
了解詳情
具有種族主義的煙草商,策略性地以特定社區為目標,提供致命的產品及操控性的信息。
環境破壞
有毒煙草廢棄物及塑料污染所帶來的環境破壞與健康風險,無人能免受其害。
了解詳情
Photo with no alt text

追究煙草商責任

對於其他有害產品,加州已在保護大眾避免受到侵害,現在正是該以同樣標準對待煙草商的時候!